Slavery Of Americ Past And Present - 1441 Words

Slavery in America: Past and Present The significance of slavery and the slave trade in the 19th century was an economic engine driving colonial America. The Atlantic slave convey and their labors touched all corners of the world. Its complex existence greatly impacted social views, politics and many industries in colonial America, these effects would transcend that era. Frankly, its shadowy existence is still part of America today. This controversial part of America’s history is often unspoken, misunderstand, overlooked or flat ignored at this day and time. Socially the ramifications of these deplorable practices still hinder African Americans and other races in various ways from the destruction of families, annihilation of cultures (forced to take slave masters’ names, language and religion) and self-hate which is a reflection from Machiavellianism infused propaganda tools used to mentally break those who are enslaved. Societies throughout history have risen in power on the backs of newly enslaved people, slavery can be followed along a chronology line as far back as Babylonian times. The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade globalized Europe’s commerce, enterprising 400 years of captured Africans for goods. Multiple factors contributed to the abolishment of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, however institutions of illegal human trafficking continues this present day. It is estimated that the world’s population of slaves exceeds 30 million. Currently, the United States buriesShow MoreRelatedHistorical Anyalysis Essay2125 Words   |  9 Pagesthe mistake of assuming that history is what happened in the past, but history is much more than what happened in the past. History is formed from analyzing evidence from the past and making a connection. Many historians have different personal perspectives on history, and by using the historical method they can all draw conclusions as to what happened and a dvocate a theory. We find that history is much more than what happened in the past from reading, The Strange Death of Silas Deane. This is aRead More African Minkisi and American Culture Essay6248 Words   |  25 Pagesgeographer first wrote of the nkisi, and said that, â€Å"These Ethiopians [that is, the BaKongo] call moquisie [minkisi] everything in which resides, in their opinion, a secret and incomprehensible virtue to do them good or ill, and to reveal event of past and future† (Williams, 13). The term illness, in this context, is quite different than what we refer to illness. Illness, to the BaKongo, meant anything from sickness, to loss of property, and the inability to succeed in things like school and work

Elite Essay Free Essays

It is now that our political leaders and decisions have made up for what they were accounted for and have provided the back-bone of America today. Our government is what establishes America’s decisions. Although some consequences can be made from what their previous aspects were, and how some of the decisions have made distrust in the government from Americans, it is only with said that, â€Å"Their failure to act, their failure to make decisions, is itself an act that is often of greater consent ounces than the decisions they do make. We will write a custom essay sample on Elite Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now It’s not necessarily the cause and effect of their decisions, but the act f speaking for America and doing something about the complications that arises within our world and our country to do the best they can to provide security and freedom even though there are limitations to freedom for security. Mills has stated, â€Å"The assumption that the security of the nation supposedly rests upon great secrecy of plan and intent. Along with the statement, â€Å"With the wide secrecy covering their operations and decisions, the power elite can mask their intentions, operations, and further consolidation. † I believe Mills is pointing out the directive of our national security being in the hands of the political officials because the government is the elite officials of America and has the authority to reach beyond the limits of other powers. Some may say the military is the elite of America because of the power and figure they portray. One may believe that the military is the most elite because they have more representatives, leaders and followers than those of our political leaders. One may obtain the fact that the military protects and has the secrecy of the united States in withstanding war power, but this is not accurate concerning the fact that the government has authority over the litany’s actions. Mills has stated, â€Å"The military order, once a slim establishment in a context of distrust fed by State militia, has become the largest and most expensive feature of government.. Thus proving my element for elite power containing that the military is not established without the governments control and authority to make decisions for the military. One may believe that corporate has the most elite power over all, but corporations only have financial power not power over the decisions that are made within our country financially. Our political establishments indeed are ended by corporate, but they cannot m ake the decisions nor have the authority to do what the government can. The government tells corporate where to spend their money and what they can spend it on. â€Å"The decisions of a handful of corporations bear upon military and political as well as upon economic developments around the world. † Mills has stated which is proof along with my statement on economic decisions going through the government before corporate is able to take action on what they are deciding to do. In conclusion political officials are the most elite of the United States today. My opinion is not disregarding the other elite powers Mills has claimed above, but only withstanding that political power is the most elite out of the two other objectives. Nothing can go forward without the government’s approval and action to speak for Our country. Military is just a figure of power for the people to obtain a sense of hope and security for our country along with corporate financial aid to help establish what needs to be conquered within our society and to help what decisions the government makes. â€Å"Everyone knows somebody has got to run the show, and that somebody usually does. † (C. Wright Mills) How to cite Elite Essay, Essays

The Proposed Research

Question: Explain Outlining the selected approach for the proposed research. Answer: It is evident that there is a broader set of research techniques that can be applied to the proposed research to gain a suitable outcome. As mentioned by Miller et al. (2012), the majority of the success of research depends on the selection of research methodology. There have been cases where the authors have planned the research but failed to select and implement necessary research approach, philosophy, and design. They end up gaining unexpected outcome from the research. Before delving into the effectiveness of research approaches, it is necessary for the researchers to understand the types of research that are usually performed for a particular purpose. The basic types of research are such as descriptive vs. analytical and qualitative vs. quantitative, applied vs. fundamental and conceptual vs. empirical Research philosophy As mentioned by Anderson and Shattuck (2012), research is considered as the belief regarding the way in which information about a particular phenomenon can be collected, analyzed and utilized. There are different types of research philosophies such as post-positivism, positivism, interpretivism, and realism. While delving into positivism research philosophy, it is observed that positivists assume that reality is in the state of stability, and it can be observed as well as described from a particular viewpoint. In addition, the positivist contends that research phenomenon could be isolated as well as observation needs to be repeatable. This may frequently involve manipulation of reality with differences in a single independent variable of the topic to identify the regularities. However, there have been some debates made on the effectiveness of positivism research philosophy regarding whether or not the positivist paradigm is effective for the social science (Tavender et al. 2014). On the contrary, it is observed that interpretivists tend to contend that with the help of subjective interpretation the reality can be understood. As mentioned by Denzin (2012), the research of phenomenon in their natural environment is fundamental to interpretivism research philosophy. Justification of choosing the selected the research philosophy There have been many cases where the authors get into the trouble of choosing the appropriate research philosophy for their respective research. Thus, for the proposed research, positivism research philosophy is chosen to be executed. According to the philosophy of positivism research philosophy, the positivists do not form a conclusion from the subjective approach. In addition, positivists rely on quantitative data that positivists assume is more significant and reliable than qualitative research. In this context, Emmel (2015) added that quantitative research is more scientific than the qualitative research. Moreover, it is also observed that quantitative data could provide objective information that authors could utilize to make scientific assumptions. In addition, by implementing positivism research philosophy, the researcher could gain structural advantages. This means the positivists believe that tend to follow and implement a well-defined structure at the time of going through the studies and making discussion. As there are multiple types of laws and principles, there is little scope for errors or flaws in the research. On the contrary, interpretivism research is not adequate for the proposed research as it is difficult to identify the exact social phenomenon. As stated by Creswell (2013), anything can be claimed without any rationale of data. The scientific approaches cannot be applied in interpretivism research philosophy. Strength and weakness of positivism research philosophy Strength Generalization: The theory involved in positivism research philosophy is easy to generalize at a large degree, based on which data for the separate issues can be collected through social context. As mentioned by Mertens (2014), the researchers find it easy to generalize research outcomes after the replication on the different population as well as a subpopulation. In addition, by implementing positivism research philosophy, the researcher could gain structural advantages. This means the positivists believe that tend to follow and implement a well-defined structure at the time of going through the studies and making discussion. As there are multiple types of laws and principles, there is little scope for errors or flaws in the research. Future assumptions can be formed with the help of quantitative research approach. As put forward by, the positive philosophy is effective for acquiring data that permits quantitative prediction, which is supposed to be made. Weakness The objectivity is not suitable in social phenomenon with experiments and human behaviour Difficult to separate individuals from the hypothesis made Ineffective and inaccuracy in scientific data may alter the end results of the hypothesis Research approaches Research approach can be divided into two different categories namely deductive as well as inductive. As mentioned by Khan (2014), the significance of the hypothesis to the research is the major distinctive point between these two approaches. It is observed that deductive approaches help to experiment the weight of assumptions. On the other side, the inductive approach helps to form new theories as well as a generalization. In addition, there have been certain differences between deductive and inductive research approach. For instance, it is observed that principles of deductive approaches are formed based on science, whereas the meaning of human involvement to events is determined to be explored. Further, as stated by Emmel (2015), generality is considered as the principle of positivism, which works out the hypothesis particularly from deductive to inductive. Justification of choosing the selected the research approach For the proposed research, the deductive research approach is chosen to be executed as the set of the hypothesis has been formed for the research. As the hypothesis of the research has been formulated, there have been certain phases that should be implemented in the research. By implementing deductive research approach for the current study, the researcher could build the theory and hypothesis and after that, the observation can be made. Based on the observation, the last stage can be finalized which is confirmation or rejection of hypothesis. On the contrary, inductive approach is not chosen for the proposed research, as it does not include the formulation of hypothesis. One of the primary reasons behind not choosing the inductive research is the lack of guarantee to its conclusion. The approach does not confirm the observation for information gathering. Reference list: Anderson, T. and Shattuck, J., 2012. Design-based research a decade of progress in education research?.Educational researcher,41(1), pp.16-25. Creswell, J.W., 2013.Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Denzin, N.K., 2012. Triangulation 2.0.Journal of Mixed Methods Research,6(2), pp.80-88. Emmel, N., 2015. Themes, variables, and the limits to calculating sample size in qualitative research: a response to Fugard and Potts.International Journal of Social Research Methodology,18(6), pp.685-686. Khan, S.N., 2014. Qualitative research method: Grounded theory.International Journal of Business and Management,9(11), p.224. Mertens, D.M., 2014.Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. Sage Publications. Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M. and Jessop, J. eds., 2012.Ethics in qualitative research. Sage. Tavender, E.J., Bosch, M., Gruen, R.L., Green, S.E., Knott, J., Francis, J.J., Michie, S. and OConnor, D.A., 2014. Understanding practice: the factors that influence management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department-a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.Implementation Science,9(1), p.8.